Google is like the getaway driver who never walked into the bank but deliberately drove the robbers there, waited outside with the engine running, collected his cut of the money, and pretended he had no idea what was going on inside. Type "Orbeez Crush Chukin' Pets" into Google during the infringing time frame, click the top shopping link, and voilà—you just bought an infringing product with Google directing the transaction and collecting ad revenue. Google actively helped make the infringement happen and profited from it—that's induced infringement.

Google also acts like someone who runs a chop shop where stolen cars get sold. They built the warehouse, they advertise it, they take a commission on every transaction—but they claim they have no idea stolen goods are being sold there, even though everyone knows that's what it's for. That's contributory infringement.

Meanwhile, Apple and Mozilla collectively receive billions of dollars every year from Google to keep Google as the default search engine, yet the Court should determine whether they knowingly turned a blind eye when those same search results promote infringing products.